Metacognition in Animals

Mar 17, 2023 | Interesting Articles

Illustration of a variety of animals including a dog, an elephant, and a dolphin, each engaged in activities that suggest thoughtfulness and learning,

Metacognition, an intriguing aspect of cognitive science, extends beyond human thinking to the realm of animals. It is defined as the ability to think about and understand one’s own thought processes. In animals, this concept takes on a multifaceted role, encompassing various elements that demonstrate a higher level of cognitive awareness. These elements include the capacity of animals to make strategic plans, track their progress in achieving these plans, assess their own performance, and consciously reflect on their knowledge and understanding of the world around them.

What is Metacognition in Animals

Metacognition, a concept often associated with human cognition, extends into the animal kingdom. This fascinating aspect of cognitive science explores whether animals possess the ability to reflect on their own thought processes. In this article, we delve into the definition of metacognition in animals, its components, and the ongoing debate among scholars and researchers about its existence in non-human species.

Definition and Aspects of Metacognition in Animals

  • Self-Reflection in Animals: Metacognition in animals refers to their capacity to think about their own thinking. This encompasses several aspects of cognitive processing.
  • Components of Metacognition: These include the ability to formulate plans, monitor progress towards goals, assess one’s own performance, and reflect on what is known or unknown.

Components of Metacognition

  • Metacognitive Knowledge: This refers to an animal’s awareness and understanding of its own cognitive processes. It’s the knowledge about how their brain functions and processes information.
  • Metacognitive Control: This aspect involves the ability to manage and direct cognitive processes to achieve specific goals. It’s about controlling one’s own thought processes for effective problem-solving and decision-making.

The Debate on Metacognition in Animals

  • Evidence in Certain Species: Research has suggested that certain animals, such as primates, crows, and dolphins, may exhibit metacognitive abilities. These studies point towards behaviours that indicate self-reflection and awareness.
  • Scepticism in the Scientific Community: However, there is ongoing debate among scientists. Some argue that what appears to be metacognition could be explained by simpler cognitive processes that don’t necessarily involve self-reflection.
  • Implications for Understanding Animal Cognition: The exploration of metacognition in animals is not just about identifying this ability in non-human species, but it also has broader implications for our understanding of animal cognition and consciousness.

The concept of metacognition in animals opens up intriguing questions about the depth and complexity of human and animal minds and cognition. While evidence points towards certain species having metacognitive abilities, the scientific community continues to explore and debate the extent and nature of these capabilities. This ongoing research enriches our understanding of animal behaviour and cognitive science.

If you find this article interesting, you might want to check out our blog and podcast section.

image of a dog engaged in problem-solving activities

Metacognition in Animals: Can They Think About Thinking?

The concept of metacognition in animals, essentially their capacity to ‘think about thinking’, presents a captivating area of study in cognitive science. This section delves into the complexities of metacognition in the animal kingdom, discussing the current understanding, debates, and implications of this intriguing topic.

Exploring the Possibility of Metacognition in Animals

  • Questioning Animal Self-Reflection: The core question revolves around whether animals possess the ability to reflect on their own thought processes, a cognitive ability known as metacognition.
  • Observational Evidence: There are indications from various studies that some animals might have the ability to plan, monitor their progress, assess their performance, and contemplate their knowledge. However, concrete evidence remains elusive.

Components of Metacognition in Animals

  • Metacognitive Knowledge: This refers to an animal’s understanding of its own cognitive processes, essentially knowing how their brain works.
  • Metacognitive Control: This involves the ability of animals to control and manage their thought processes to achieve specific objectives.

The Ongoing Debate in Scientific Circles

  • Differing Views Among Researchers: The existence of metacognition in animals is a subject of ongoing debate. While some studies suggest that species like primates, crows, and dolphins exhibit metacognitive abilities, others argue these behaviours might be due to simpler cognitive processes.
  • Evidence from Behavioural Tests: Certain animals, such as chimpanzees and orangutans, have passed the mirror test, often used to assess self-awareness and metacognition. Birds like crows and parrots have shown advanced problem-solving skills and tool-making abilities, hinting at possible metacognitive capabilities.

Key Points in the Study of Animal Metacognition

  • Tests and Experiments: Various tests conducted on animals aim to gauge their level of self-awareness and metacognition, providing insights into their cognitive abilities.
  • Complexity of Metacognition: Understanding metacognition in both humans and animals is a complex endeavour. The full extent and nature of these cognitive processes are not yet fully comprehended.

The study of metacognition in animals is a fascinating field that sheds light on the depths of animal intelligence and self-awareness. While the evidence is still forming and debates continue, the exploration of this topic offers valuable insights into the cognitive abilities of non-human species and challenges our understanding of animal and human consciousness. This ongoing research is pivotal in expanding our knowledge of the cognitive world of animals.

image of a dog looking into a mirror with a confused expression

Do Dogs Recognise Themselves in the Mirror? Understanding Animal Self-Awareness

The intriguing question of whether dogs recognize themselves in mirrors leads to broader discussions about self-awareness in animals. This section explores the use of the mirror test in assessing animal self-awareness, the varied results among different species, and the complexities involved in interpreting these findings.

The Mirror Test and Animal Self-Awareness

  • Methodology of the Mirror Test: The mirror test is designed to determine if an animal can recognize its own reflection, a marker of self-awareness.
  • Varied Results Among Species: While some species like primates, elephants, and magpies have successfully passed the test, indicating a level of self-recognition, others like dogs, cats, and most birds have not.
  • Implications of the Test Results: The failure of certain animals to pass the mirror test does not necessarily indicate a lack of self-awareness. It may reflect differences in sensory processing or the relevance of visual cues in their natural behaviour.

Debates and Considerations

  • Questioning the Test’s Reliability: The effectiveness and universality of the mirror test as a measure of self-awareness are subjects of debate among researchers.
  • Survival vs. Self-Awareness: In the wild, survival-related abilities are prioritized over traits like self-awareness. This factor may influence how animals interact with their reflection.
  • Alternative Interpretations of Behaviour: Some scientists argue that behaviours observed during the mirror test might be the result of simpler cognitive processes rather than an indication of metacognition or self-awareness.

Metacognition and Its Complexity

  • Uncertainty in Evidence: The current understanding of metacognition in animals, including dogs, remains unclear and is a topic of ongoing discussion in the scientific community.
  • Simpler Cognitive Processes: There is a viewpoint that some behaviours attributed to self-awareness or metacognition might be better explained by more basic cognitive functions.
  • The Challenge of Understanding Metacognition: Comprehending metacognition is a complex task, not fully mastered even in human studies. This complexity adds to the challenge of determining its presence and functioning in animals.

The question of whether non human animals recognise themselves in mirrors opens a window into the broader subject of animal self-awareness and metacognition. While the mirror test provides valuable insights, the interpretation of its results is nuanced, leading to debates and further inquiries. Understanding animal cognition, including the concept of metacognition, continues to be a dynamic and evolving area of research, offering intriguing perspectives on the cognitive world of animals.

image of a dolphin looking into a mirror with a curious or puzzled expression

Why Do Some Animals Fail the Mirror Test for Self-Awareness?

The mirror test, a key tool in assessing self-awareness in animals, yields varied results across different species. This section delves into why certain animals pass or fail this test and the broader implications for understanding self-awareness in the animal kingdom.

The Mirror Test Explained

  • Test Methodology: The mirror test involves marking an animal’s body and observing its reaction to its reflection in a mirror. Successful identification and examination of the mark indicate self-recognition.
  • Interpreting the Results: The ability to use a mirror to explore the mark is seen as an indication of self-awareness. However, the accuracy and universality of this interpretation are subjects of debate.

Species-Specific Results

  • Successful Species: Some animals, such as primates, elephants, and magpies, have shown the ability to recognize themselves in mirrors, suggesting a level of self-awareness.
  • Unsuccessful Species: Conversely, species like dogs, cats, and most birds typically fail the mirror test, not using the mirror to investigate the mark on their bodies.

Critiques and Alternatives to the Mirror Test

  • Debating the Assumption: The assumption that mirror recognition equates to self-awareness has been questioned. Some researchers argue that there may be other forms of self-awareness not captured by the mirror test.
  • Differing Visual Systems: The ability to recognize oneself in a mirror is influenced by an animal’s visual system. Some species may not rely heavily on visual cues, affecting their performance in the test.
  • Survival Over Self-Recognition: In the wild, survival skills such as hunting or evading predators are prioritized over the ability to recognize oneself in a mirror. This suggests that failing the mirror test does not necessarily reflect a lack of self-awareness.

The Limitations of the Mirror Test

  • Not a Definitive Measure: The mirror test, while valuable, is not the definitive measure of self-awareness. Its effectiveness and applicability vary among species.
  • Ongoing Debate: The test continues to be a topic of debate among researchers, with discussions focusing on its validity and the interpretation of its results in different animals.

Understanding why some animals fail the mirror test for self-awareness highlights the complexities of animal cognition. The test provides insights into comparative cognition but is not conclusive in determining self-awareness across all species. This ongoing research into animal self-awareness, encompassing both successes and failures in the mirror test, contributes to a deeper understanding of animal behaviour and cognitive capabilities.

Examples of Metacognition in Animals: A Closer Look

Metacognition in animals, the capacity for self-reflection and thought analysis, has been a subject of fascinating scientific studies. This section explores various instances where metacognition has been observed in different animal species, highlighting their ability to plan, solve problems, and adjust their actions based on self-awareness.

Metacognition in Primates

  • Chimpanzees, Orangutans, and Capuchin Monkeys: Research shows that these primates can engage in complex planning and problem-solving. They have demonstrated the ability to use mirrors for self-inspection and employ trial-and-error methods effectively.
  • Problem-Solving Skills: Their capacity to solve puzzles and use tools effectively points to a sophisticated level of cognitive processing, indicating metacognition.

Crows’ Advanced Cognitive Abilities

  • Planning and Tool-Making: Crows have shown remarkable abilities in forward-planning and tool-making. They can manipulate objects to achieve desired outcomes, such as bending a wire to retrieve food.
  • Tool Selection: In various scenarios, crows have demonstrated the ability to select the most effective tool, indicating a high level of cognitive understanding and decision-making.

Dolphins’ Self-Awareness

  • Reflective Thinking: Dolphins exhibit the ability to track and evaluate their thought processes. They demonstrate awareness of their own uncertainty in tasks, often seeking additional information before making decisions.
  • Decision-Making Process: Their capacity to recognize uncertainty and adapt their actions accordingly showcases a significant level of metacognitive ability.

Dogs’ Understanding of Their Own Thinking

  • Response to Commands: Studies indicate that dogs can discern when they do not understand a command. In such instances, they often seek further clarification from their owners, reflecting an understanding of their own cognitive limits.
  • Behavioural Adjustments: Dogs’ ability to adjust their behaviour based on their understanding further emphasizes their metacognitive capabilities.

Rats’ Cognitive Monitoring

  • Awareness of Knowledge Gaps: Research with rats has revealed their ability to recognize when they lack information, such as the location of a reward.
  • Exploratory Behaviour: Rats demonstrate an increased tendency to explore when they are uncertain, suggesting that they can monitor their thoughts and adapt their actions accordingly.

The evidence of metacognition in various animal species, from primates to rats, reveals a complex and rich tapestry of cognitive abilities across the animal kingdom. These examples not only demonstrate the presence of advanced cognitive skills in animals but also provide a deeper understanding in comparative psychology of how different species process and reflect on their thoughts. This ongoing research into animal metacognition is crucial in broadening our comprehension of animal intelligence and cognitive processes.

Why dogs fail the mirror test

It’s important to note that the mirror test is a widely used method to measure self-awareness in animals, but it is not a definitive test and it is still debated if it’s the best way to measure self-awareness in animals. Therefore, it’s not accurate to say that dogs lack self-awareness, but rather that they may have different ways of understanding and interacting with the world.

  • One possibility is that dogs do not have the same visual system as primates, and they may not be able to recognise their own reflection in the same way.
  • Another explanation is that dogs may not have the same level of self-awareness as primates. They may be aware of their own existence and their surroundings, but they may not possess the same level of self-awareness as primates, which would allow them to recognise themselves in a mirror.
  • A third explanation is that dogs may not find the mirror test as relevant to their everyday life. In the wild, dogs are not usually exposed to mirrors and thus may not have a natural tendency to use them as a tool for exploring the world.
  • Finally, dogs may rely more on other senses, such as smell and hearing, to gather information about their surroundings, rather than relying on their sense of sight. This could make them less likely to use visual cues, such as a mirror reflection, to gather information about themselves.
image of an elephant engaged in solving a puzzle

Explore Animal Cognition with Ken Ramirez

If you enjoyed this article, you may wish to watch our podcast episode with Ken Ramirez. Ken is a well-known animal behaviour expert with extensive knowledge in animal cognition. Ken’s expertise in animal cognition has made him a sought-after speaker, and he has presented at many conferences worldwide, including the annual Association of Zoos and Aquariums conference. He has also authored several books on animal behaviour and training, including his latest book, “The Eye of the Trainer: Animal Training, Transformation, and Trust.”

About Me

Jim Gillies, a Certified Dog Behaviourist and Trainer in Glasgow with over 10 years of experience, prioritises canine well-being through modern, science-backed methods. Handling 4000+ cases of 1-to-1 behaviour training, Jim is fully accredited, insured, and recognised for addressing various behavioural issues including aggression, separation anxiety, and more. Jim holds qualifications in level 5 (merit) Advance Diploma Canine Behaviour Management and level 6 Applied Animal Behaviour. Explore his insightful blog and podcast, sharing expert knowledge on dog training and behaviour. Certified by the IAABC, Jim’s expertise makes him a reliable choice for addressing your dog’s needs.

Contact Information

Should you have any questions about this article, feel free to contact me on:


Mobile: 07864029933


Please note that I am an Amazon Affiliate, and the products recommended in this guide are sold on Amazon. For each product listed, I have provided a hyperlink that directs you to the Amazon page where you can make a purchase. Should you decide to buy any of the products through the provided links, I will earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. This affiliate commission helps to support my work and continue providing valuable information to my readers. Thank you for your support!


1. What is Metacognition? Metacognition, often described as “thinking about thinking,” involves the ability to plan, monitor progress, evaluate performance, and reflect on one’s own knowledge. It consists of two main components: metacognitive knowledge (awareness of one’s cognitive states and processes) and metacognitive control (ability to manage these processes to achieve certain goals).

2. Do animals possess metacognition? The extent of metacognition in animals remains a debated topic among researchers. Some animals like primates, crows, and dolphins have displayed signs of metacognition in various studies, while others, like dogs, have shown different results, especially in tests like the mirror test for self-awareness.

3. What is the mirror test and why is it significant? The mirror test gauges self-awareness by marking an animal and observing its reaction to its reflection. Animals passing the test exhibit a level of self-awareness, which is often associated with human metacognition. However, the test’s reliability and the assumption that mirror self-recognition equates to self-awareness are debated among scholars.

4. Why do some animals fail the mirror test? Several factors might contribute to this, including differences in visual systems, levels of self-awareness, and reliance on other senses. Moreover, the relevance of the mirror test to an animal’s natural environment and its priorities for survival could influence the results.

5. Does failing the mirror test imply a lack of self-awareness or metacognition? Not necessarily. The mirror test is just one method to measure self-awareness and conscious metacognition, and its failure could be attributed to different sensory priorities or other cognitive differences. The understanding of self-awareness and metacognition in animals is still evolving, and researchers explore alternative methods to gauge these cognitive abilities.

6. Are there other methods to study metacognition in animals? Yes, various studies have employed different methods to explore metacognition in animals. These include problem-solving tasks, uncertainty monitoring, and tool-use tasks among others. The diverse behaviours exhibited by different species in these tasks contribute to the ongoing discussion on animal metacognition.

7. What are some examples of metacognition in animals? Some examples include primates using mirrors to inspect objects, crows making tools to obtain food, dolphins adjusting behaviour based on task certainty, and even dogs and rats seeking more information when uncertain about a task.

8. How does metacognition in animals impact our understanding of animal cognition? Exploring metacognition in animals helps in understanding the complexity of animal cognition, which could further inform animal training practices, conservation efforts, and even contribute to insights into human cognition.

9. Where can I learn more about metacognition in animals? You might want to check out our blog and podcast section or watch our podcast episode with animal behaviour expert Ken Ramirez, who has extensive knowledge in animal cognition and has shared his insights at many conferences worldwide.

10. Are there any books on animal cognition? Yes, Ken Ramirez has authored several books on animal behaviour and training, including his latest book, “The Eye of the Trainer: Animal Training, Transformation, and Trust,” which delves into animal cognition among other topics.

Learn more on this topic

Related Posts

Can Dogs Eat Tomatoes?

Can Dogs Eat Tomatoes?

Can dogs eat tomatoes? Yes, but it’s not quite that simple. While ripe tomatoes are safe for dogs in moderation, the unripe ones can be dangerous. This article will guide you through safely including tomatoes in your dog’s diet, pinpoint the hazards of unripe tomatoes, and suggest alternative treats to keep your furry friend safe and...

Best Dog Walks in Glasgow

Best Dog Walks in Glasgow

What are the Best Dog Walks in Glasgow? Glasgow, renowned for its vibrant culture and historical landmarks, also boasts some of the best dog walking routes in Scotland. Whether you're a local or just visiting, these trails offer not just exercise for your four-legged friend but also a sensory feast for you both. This guide will delve into...

Puzzle Feeders for Dogs

Puzzle Feeders for Dogs

What are Puzzle Feeders for Dogs? Puzzle feeders for dogs are more than just a trendy gadget for pet owners. They are a fundamental tool in enriching your dog's life, both mentally and physically. In this guide, we'll look at puzzle feeders and why they're important for dog owners. Key Takeaways: BenefitExplanationMental StimulationPuzzle...


Download our FREE Dog Training eBook now

“Understanding Canine Behavior: A Guide for Dog Owners” is an essential resource for dog owners who wish to develop a deeper comprehension of their furry companion’s behaviour. As a dog guardian, it is natural to want your pet to be healthy, happy, and well-behaved. However, canine behaviour can often be puzzling or even problematic. It is easy to forget that we share our homes with a predator species and that our dogs must adapt to our world more than we must adapt to theirs.

This guide offers valuable insights and strategies to help dog owners improve their understanding of their pets’ behaviour, ultimately leading to a more fulfilling and enjoyable relationship between dog and owner. This guide provides a comprehensive overview of dog behaviour, including how they communicate and learn, and the role of instincts. With this knowledge, dog owners can better understand why their pet behaves in certain ways and take steps to modify behaviour as needed.